As (V) adsorption characteristics of iron oxide coated sands

The presence of arsenic has been great concern because of its toxicity for human health. Generally As forms stable solids in the presence of Ba and has strong affinity for sulfur. The purpose of the study is to compare the As (V) adsorption capacities of iron oxide coated sand (IOCS) and sulfate-mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese journal of geochemistry Vol. 25; no. B08; p. 142
Main Author Kyung-Seok Ko Jae Gon Kim In-Suk Oh Joo Sung Ahn Heejun Suk Hyoung-Soo Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The presence of arsenic has been great concern because of its toxicity for human health. Generally As forms stable solids in the presence of Ba and has strong affinity for sulfur. The purpose of the study is to compare the As (V) adsorption capacities of iron oxide coated sand (IOCS) and sulfate-modified coated sand (SMIOCS) which are used as water treatment materials for As removal. To describe the As (V) adsorption behaviour of IOCS and SMIOCS, the batch and kinetic experiments were conducted. The results of acid and alkali resistance tests for two iron oxide coated sands, IOCS and SMIOCS, showed that they were appropriate for the usage of water treatment material. From the XRD analysis by freeze-drying technique, the coated materials of IOCS and SMIOCS are proved to be goethite and barite. The batch and kinetic experiments showed that SMIOCS had higher adsorption capacity for As (V) than IOCS and it is caused by the higher surface area of SMIOCS than that of IOCS. The adsorption capacities of IOCS and SMIOCS were decreased by the lowering of pH.
Bibliography:As (V) adsorption; iron oxide coated sand; batch and kinetic
batch and kinetic
52-1043/P
iron oxide coated sand
As (V) adsorption
X703.1
ISSN:1000-9426
1993-0364