La Révolution comme catastrophe chez André Malraux et Georges Bataille

In his review of La Condition humaine, Georges Bataille asserts that André Malraux’s novel shows how revolutionary power is based, in its psychological structure, on a catastrophe, on the lasting consciousness of a catastrophe upon which has depended the fate of multitudes. From this reading of Malr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAcademic Journal of Modern Philology no. 9; pp. 245 - 254
Main Author Bowd, Gavin
Format Journal Article
LanguageFrench
Published Committee for Philology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław Branch 2020
Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk we Wrocławiu
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In his review of La Condition humaine, Georges Bataille asserts that André Malraux’s novel shows how revolutionary power is based, in its psychological structure, on a catastrophe, on the lasting consciousness of a catastrophe upon which has depended the fate of multitudes. From this reading of Malraux, we will explore the catastrophic vision of Bataille himself in his novel Le Bleu du ciel and his essays for Contre-Attaque, written in the course of the 1930s, but, in the case of Le Bleu du ciel, only published more than twenty years afterwards. In the face of a “rising tide of murder” that seems to make the triumph of fascism and war inevitable, the failure of his dream of a “Popular Front in the street” is embodied in the political and erotic impotence of the troubling character of Henri Troppmann. Bataille’s dead-end contrasts brutally with the publicly committed work of Malraux, who seems to offer an alternative vision of revolutionary fate. But are there similarities between the “committed” novelist Malraux and the “shameful” one that is Bataille? Both writers show a profound interest in the sacred, which transcends a narrowly political frame.
ISSN:2299-7164
2353-3218