Diskurzné stratégie modelovania obrazu druhého na príklade týždenníka Argumenty i fakty

The goal of this article is to show on the example of three discourse fragments – texts published in the Russian weekly magazine Argumenty i fakty – the discourse strategies typical for modeling the group of the other. Given strategies are arranged into several groups. Within nomination – and predic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJazyk a kultúra Vol. 6; no. 21-22; pp. 4 - 11
Main Author Cingerová, Nina
Format Journal Article
LanguageSlovak
Published Lingvokulturologické a prekladateľsko-tlmočnícke centrum excelentnosti pri Filozofickej fakulte Prešovskej university v Prešove (LPTCE) 2015
Linguo-Cultural and Translation-Interpretation Centre of Excellence at the Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov in Prešov
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The goal of this article is to show on the example of three discourse fragments – texts published in the Russian weekly magazine Argumenty i fakty – the discourse strategies typical for modeling the group of the other. Given strategies are arranged into several groups. Within nomination – and predicational ones stands out especially the so-called overlexicalization. Within the argumentation strategies the so-called trajectio in alium, which marked the attempts to divert the blame, responsibility, semiotic space-reorganization, and secundum quid – hasty generalization. While positioning the author we detected during the analysis as strategy of replacing words with negative conotations (expulsion, dicrimination) by euphemism and using so-called disclaimer.
ISSN:1338-1148