Analysis of the Rugby Game Result through the Rate of Territorial Dominance and Ball Possession

• Published in: Revista Românească pentru educaţie multidimensională Vol. X; no. 1; pp. 20 - 27
• Main Author: Badea, Dan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Editura Lumen, Asociatia Lumen 2018; Lumen Publishing House, Lumen Association
• Subjects: Essay|Book Review |Scientific Life; interpretive model; social constructivism; data encoding; qualitative research; Grounded Theory
• ISSN: 2066-7329; 2067-9270

This research aims to analyse the determination of rugby game results, as a consequence of territorial dominance or ball possession, by the teams participating in the 2015 Rugby World Cup. The objectives of our scientific approach were to record the variables linked to possession and territorial dominance in the rugby games and to process and interpret the results. In this applicative research, 48 matches were analysed, tracking total territorial dominance and sequential territorial dominance in the last 10 minutes of the game, as well as total possession and sequential possession in the last 10 minutes of the game. The research methods used are: scientific documentation, observation, measurement, statistical and mathematical method, graphical method. The results obtained from data processing and interpretation are contradictory. Thus, we have results displayed accordingly, when the team with total and sequential territorial dominance and superior total and sequential possession wins the game, but also when the team with total and sequential territorial dominance and superior total and sequential possession loses the game. We have results when the team with total territorial dominance and superior total possession wins the game, which is normal, but also results when the team with territorial dominance only in the last 10 minutes and superior possession only in the last 10 minutes wins the game. We might consider that these results are not a first, that they represent the exception, but what the research emphasises are the proportions between the results considered normal and those contradictory, which may generate questions and answers about the competition strategy.