On “Westsplaining,” Realism, and Technologies of the Self: A Foucauldian Reading of the Realist Commentary on Ukraine

The article offers a Foucauldian reading of the Western realist commentary on the Russo-Ukrainian war which often faces the charges of “Westsplaining.” It situates this commentary in the broader context of knowledge production and the power-knowledge nexūs it reproduces and conceptualizes realism as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of regional security Vol. XIX; no. 1; pp. 77 - 96
Main Author Kazharski, Aliaksei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Faculty of Political Sciences - University of Belgrade 2024
Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Beogradu
Subjects
Geopolitics
Peace and Conflict Studies
Political Philosophy
Ukraine
Westsplaining
war
realism
Foucault
discourse
Russia
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The article offers a Foucauldian reading of the Western realist commentary on the Russo-Ukrainian war which often faces the charges of “Westsplaining.” It situates this commentary in the broader context of knowledge production and the power-knowledge nexūs it reproduces and conceptualizes realism as a discourse in the Foucauldian sense. As the article argues, this conceptualization allows one to capture its specific technologies of power which, in this case, can be understood as a form of technology of the Self, or, in other words, the disciplining of the collective subjects of world politics (nation-states) through the specifically realist constructs of rationality and prudence that all states are expected to adhere to in the making of their foreign policy. Additionally, the article suggests that this conceptualization of realism as a discourse can be analytically helpful in making sense of the way in which very different genres such as academic research and the op-ed policy commentary, frequently provided by realist IR scholars, are connected through the political economy of knowledge production, thus forming a relationship of discursive symbiosis and mutual legitimation.
ISSN:2217-995X