A Comparative Evaluation of a Conditional Median-Based Bayesian Growth Curve Modeling Approach with Missing Data
Longitudinal data are essential for studying within subject change and between subject differences in change. However, missing data, especially when the observed variables are nonnormal, remain a significant challenge in longitudinal analysis. Full information maximum likelihood estimation (FIML) an...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
18.04.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Longitudinal data are essential for studying within subject change and
between subject differences in change. However, missing data, especially when
the observed variables are nonnormal, remain a significant challenge in
longitudinal analysis. Full information maximum likelihood estimation (FIML)
and a two stage robust estimation (TSRE) are widely used to handle missing
data, but their effectiveness may diminish with data skewness, high missingness
rates, and nonignorable missingness. Recently, a robust median \textendash
based Bayesian (RMB) approach for growth curve modeling (GCM) was proposed to
handle nonnormal longitudinal data, yet its performance with missing data has
not been fully investigated. This study fills that gap by using Monte Carlo
simulations to evaluate RMB relative to FIML and TSRE. Overall, the RMB
\textendash based GCM is shown to be a reliable option for managing both
ignorable and nonignorable missing data across a variety of distributional
scenarios. An empirical example illustrates the application of these methods. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2504.13451 |