Clicks, comments, consequences: Are content creators' socio-structural and platform characteristics shaping the exposure to negative sentiment, offensive language, and hate speech on YouTube?
Receiving negative sentiment, offensive comments, or even hate speech is a constant part of the working experience of content creators (CCs) on YouTube - a growing occupational group in the platform economy. This study investigates how socio-structural characteristics such as the age, gender, and ra...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
10.04.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.2504.07676 |
Cover
Summary: | Receiving negative sentiment, offensive comments, or even hate speech is a
constant part of the working experience of content creators (CCs) on YouTube -
a growing occupational group in the platform economy. This study investigates
how socio-structural characteristics such as the age, gender, and race of CCs
but also platform features including the number of subscribers, community
strength, and the channel topic shape differences in the occurrence of these
phenomena on that platform. Drawing on a random sample of n=3,695 YouTube
channels from German-speaking countries, we conduct a comprehensive analysis
combining digital trace data, enhanced with hand-coded variables to include
socio-structural characteristics in social media data. Publicly visible
negative sentiment, offensive language, and hate speech are detected with
machine- and deep-learning methods using N=40,000,000 comments. Contrary to
existing studies our findings indicate that female content creators are
confronted with less negative communication. Notably, our analysis reveals that
while BIPoC, who work as CCs, receive significantly more negative sentiment,
they aren't exposed to more offensive comments or hate speech. Additionally,
platform characteristics also play a crucial role, as channels publishing
content on conspiracy theories or politics are more frequently subject to
negative communication. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2504.07676 |