The cohomology objects of a semi-abelian variety are small
Theory Appl. Categ. 44 (2025), no. 22, 643--663 A well-known, but often ignored issue in Yoneda-style definitions of cohomology objects via collections of $n$-step extensions (i.e., equivalence classes of exact sequences of a given length $n$ between two given objects, usually subject to further cri...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
19.06.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Theory Appl. Categ. 44 (2025), no. 22, 643--663 A well-known, but often ignored issue in Yoneda-style definitions of cohomology objects via collections of $n$-step extensions (i.e., equivalence classes of exact sequences of a given length $n$ between two given objects, usually subject to further criteria, and equipped with some algebraic structure) is, whether such a collection of extensions forms a set. We explain that in the context of a semi-abelian variety of algebras, the answer to this question is, essentially, yes: for the collection of all $n$-step extensions between any two objects, a set of representing extensions can be chosen, so that the collection of extensions is "small" in the sense that a bijection to a set exists.
We further consider some variations on this result, involving double extensions and crossed extensions (in the context of a semi-abelian variety), and Schreier extensions (in the category of monoids). |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2411.17200 |