Prophet Inequality from Samples: Is the More the Merrier?
We study a variant of the single-choice prophet inequality problem where the decision-maker does not know the underlying distribution and has only access to a set of samples from the distributions. Rubinstein et al. [2020] showed that the optimal competitive-ratio of $\frac{1}{2}$ can surprisingly b...
Saved in:
Main Author | |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
31.08.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We study a variant of the single-choice prophet inequality problem where the
decision-maker does not know the underlying distribution and has only access to
a set of samples from the distributions. Rubinstein et al. [2020] showed that
the optimal competitive-ratio of $\frac{1}{2}$ can surprisingly be obtained by
observing a set of $n$ samples, one from each of the distributions. In this
paper, we prove that this competitive-ratio of $\frac{1}{2}$ becomes
unattainable when the decision-maker is provided with a set of more samples. We
then examine the natural class of ordinal static threshold algorithms, where
the algorithm selects the $i$-th highest ranked sample, sets this sample as a
static threshold, and then chooses the first value that exceeds this threshold.
We show that the best possible algorithm within this class achieves a
competitive-ratio of $0.433$. Along the way, we utilize the tools developed in
the paper and provide an alternative proof of the main result of Rubinstein et
al. [2020]. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.00559 |