From Top-Right to User-Right: Perceptual Prioritization of Point-Feature Label Positions
In cartography, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and visualization, the position of a label relative to its point feature is crucial for readability and user experience. Alongside other factors, the point-feature label placement (PFLP) is typically governed by the Position Priority Order (PPO),...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
12.06.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In cartography, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and visualization, the
position of a label relative to its point feature is crucial for readability
and user experience. Alongside other factors, the point-feature label placement
(PFLP) is typically governed by the Position Priority Order (PPO), a systematic
raking of potential label positions around a point feature according to
predetermined priorities. While there is a broad consensus on factors such as
avoiding label conflicts and ensuring clear label-to-feature associations,
there is no agreement on PPO. Most PFLP techniques rely on traditional PPOs
grounded in typographic and cartographic conventions established decades ago,
which may no longer meet today's user expectations. In contrast, commercial
products like Google Maps and Mapbox use non-traditional PPOs for unreported
reasons. Our extensive user study introduces the Perceptual Position Priority
Order (PerceptPPO), a user-validated PPO that significantly departs from
traditional conventions. A key finding is that labels placed above point
features are significantly preferred by users, contrary to the conventional
top-right position. We also conducted a supplementary study on the preferred
label density, an area scarcely explored in prior research. Finally, we
performed a comparative user study assessing the perceived quality of
PerceptPPO over existing PPOs, advocating its adoption in cartographic and GIS
applications, as well as in other types of visualizations. Our research,
supported by nearly 800 participants from 48 countries and over 45,500 pairwise
comparisons, offers practical guidance for designers and application developers
aiming to optimize user engagement and comprehension, paving the way for more
intuitive and accessible visualizations. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2407.11996 |