MeSH Concept Relevance and Knowledge Evolution: A Data-driven Perspective
The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), one of the main knowledge organization systems in the biomedical domain, constantly evolves following the latest scientific discoveries in health and life sciences. Previous research focused on quantifying information in MeSH using its hierarchical structure. In...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
26.06.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), one of the main knowledge organization
systems in the biomedical domain, constantly evolves following the latest
scientific discoveries in health and life sciences. Previous research focused
on quantifying information in MeSH using its hierarchical structure. In this
work, we propose a data-driven approach based on information theory and network
analyses to quantify the relevance of MeSH concepts. Our approach leverages
article annotations and their citation networks to compute informativeness,
usefulness, disruptiveness, and influence of MeSH concepts over time. Using the
the citation network and the MeSH hierarchy, different relevance aspects are
computed, and an aggregation algorithm is used to propagate the relevance
scores to the parent nodes. We evaluated our approach using changes in the
terminology and showed that it effectively captures the evolution of MeSH
concepts. At the first level of the hierarchy, the most relevant concept -
Chemical and Drugs - had a decreasing trend (\textit{p}-value $< 0.01$), while
at the second level, the most relevant concept - Neoplasms - had an increasing
trend (\textit{p}-value $< 0.01$). We show that the mean relevance of evolving
concepts is higher for concepts that remained unchanged (2.09E-03 \textit{vs.}
8.46E-04). Moreover, we validated the ability of our framework to characterize
retracted articles and showed that concepts used to annotate retracted articles
(mean relevance: 0.17) differ substantially from those used to annotate
non-retracted ones (mean relevance: 0.15). The proposed framework provides an
effective method to rank concept relevance and can be useful in maintaining
evolving knowledge organization systems. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2406.18792 |