Understanding the Cluster LP for Correlation Clustering

In the classic Correlation Clustering problem introduced by Bansal, Blum, and Chawla~(FOCS 2002), the input is a complete graph where edges are labeled either $+$ or $-$, and the goal is to find a partition of the vertices that minimizes the sum of the +edges across parts plus the sum of the -edges...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Cao, Nairen, Cohen-Addad, Vincent, Lee, Euiwoong, Li, Shi, Newman, Alantha, Vogl, Lukas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 26.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the classic Correlation Clustering problem introduced by Bansal, Blum, and Chawla~(FOCS 2002), the input is a complete graph where edges are labeled either $+$ or $-$, and the goal is to find a partition of the vertices that minimizes the sum of the +edges across parts plus the sum of the -edges within parts. In recent years, Chawla, Makarychev, Schramm and Yaroslavtsev~(STOC 2015) gave a 2.06-approximation by providing a near-optimal rounding of the standard LP, and Cohen-Addad, Lee, Li, and Newman~(FOCS 2022, 2023) finally bypassed the integrality gap of 2 for this LP giving a $1.73$-approximation for the problem. In order to create a simple and unified framework for Correlation Clustering similar to those for {\em typical} approximate optimization tasks, we propose the {\em cluster LP} as a strong linear program that might tightly capture the approximability of Correlation Clustering. It unifies all the previous relaxations for the problem. We demonstrate the power of the cluster LP by presenting a simple rounding algorithm, and providing two analyses, one analytically proving a 1.49-approximation and the other solving a factor-revealing SDP to show a 1.437-approximation. Both proofs introduce principled methods by which to analyze the performance of the algorithm, resulting in a significantly improved approximation guarantee. Finally, we prove an integrality gap of $4/3$ for the cluster LP, showing our 1.437-upper bound cannot be drastically improved. Our gap instance directly inspires an improved NP-hardness of approximation with a ratio $24/23 \approx 1.042$; no explicit hardness ratio was known before.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17509