The geometric error is less than the pollution error when solving the high-frequency Helmholtz equation with high-order FEM on curved domains

We consider the $h$-version of the finite-element method, where accuracy is increased by decreasing the meshwidth $h$ while keeping the polynomial degree $p$ constant, applied to the Helmholtz equation. Although the question "how quickly must $h$ decrease as the wavenumber $k$ increases to main...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Chaumont-Frelet, Théophile, Spence, Euan A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 29.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We consider the $h$-version of the finite-element method, where accuracy is increased by decreasing the meshwidth $h$ while keeping the polynomial degree $p$ constant, applied to the Helmholtz equation. Although the question "how quickly must $h$ decrease as the wavenumber $k$ increases to maintain accuracy?" has been studied intensively since the 1990s, none of the existing rigorous wavenumber-explicit analyses take into account the approximation of the geometry. In this paper we prove that for nontrapping problems solved using straight elements the geometric error is order $kh$, which is then less than the pollution error $k(kh)^{2p}$ when $k$ is large; this fact is then illustrated in numerical experiments. More generally, we prove that, even for problems with strong trapping, using degree four (in 2-d) or degree five (in 3-d) polynomials and isoparametric elements ensures that the geometric error is smaller than the pollution error for most large wavenumbers.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2401.16413