SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track

Test case generation (TCG) for Python poses distinctive challenges due to the language's dynamic nature and the absence of strict type information. Previous research has successfully explored automated unit TCG for Python, with solutions outperforming random test generation methods. Nevertheles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Erni, Nicolas, Mohammed, Al-Ameen Mohammed Ali, Birchler, Christian, Derakhshanfar, Pouria, Lukasczyk, Stephan, Panichella, Sebastiano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 26.01.2024
Subjects
Computer Science - Software Engineering
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Test case generation (TCG) for Python poses distinctive challenges due to the language's dynamic nature and the absence of strict type information. Previous research has successfully explored automated unit TCG for Python, with solutions outperforming random test generation methods. Nevertheless, fundamental issues persist, hindering the practical adoption of existing test case generators. To address these challenges, we report on the organization, challenges, and results of the first edition of the Python Testing Competition. Four tools, namely UTBotPython, Klara, Hypothesis Ghostwriter, and Pynguin were executed on a benchmark set consisting of 35 Python source files sampled from 7 open-source Python projects for a time budget of 400 seconds. We considered one configuration of each tool for each test subject and evaluated the tools' effectiveness in terms of code and mutation coverage. This paper describes our methodology, the analysis of the results together with the competing tools, and the challenges faced while running the competition experiments.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2401.15189