AI-based Clinical Assessment of Optic Nerve Head Robustness Superseding Biomechanical Testing
$\mathbf{Purpose}$: To use artificial intelligence (AI) to: (1) exploit biomechanical knowledge of the optic nerve head (ONH) from a relatively large population; (2) assess ONH robustness from a single optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan of the ONH; (3) identify what critical three-dimensional (...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
09.06.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | $\mathbf{Purpose}$: To use artificial intelligence (AI) to: (1) exploit
biomechanical knowledge of the optic nerve head (ONH) from a relatively large
population; (2) assess ONH robustness from a single optical coherence
tomography (OCT) scan of the ONH; (3) identify what critical three-dimensional
(3D) structural features make a given ONH robust.
$\mathbf{Design}$: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
$\mathbf{Methods}$: 316 subjects had their ONHs imaged with OCT before and
after acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation through ophthalmo-dynamometry.
IOP-induced lamina-cribrosa deformations were then mapped in 3D and used to
classify ONHs. Those with LC deformations superior to 4% were considered
fragile, while those with deformations inferior to 4% robust. Learning from
these data, we compared three AI algorithms to predict ONH robustness strictly
from a baseline (undeformed) OCT volume: (1) a random forest classifier; (2) an
autoencoder; and (3) a dynamic graph CNN (DGCNN). The latter algorithm also
allowed us to identify what critical 3D structural features make a given ONH
robust.
$\mathbf{Results}$: All 3 methods were able to predict ONH robustness from 3D
structural information alone and without the need to perform biomechanical
testing. The DGCNN (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]: 0.76 $\pm$
0.08) outperformed the autoencoder (AUC: 0.70 $\pm$ 0.07) and the random forest
classifier (AUC: 0.69 $\pm$ 0.05). Interestingly, to assess ONH robustness, the
DGCNN mainly used information from the scleral canal and the LC insertion
sites.
$\mathbf{Conclusions}$: We propose an AI-driven approach that can assess the
robustness of a given ONH solely from a single OCT scan of the ONH, and without
the need to perform biomechanical testing. Longitudinal studies should
establish whether ONH robustness could help us identify fast visual field loss
progressors. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2206.04689 |