Discourse Analysis of Covid-19 in Persian Twitter Social Networks Using Graph Mining and Natural Language Processing
One of the new scientific ways of understanding discourse dynamics is analyzing the public data of social networks. This research's aim is Post-structuralist Discourse Analysis (PDA) of Covid-19 phenomenon (inspired by Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory) by using Intelligent Data Mining...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.09.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00298 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | One of the new scientific ways of understanding discourse dynamics is
analyzing the public data of social networks. This research's aim is
Post-structuralist Discourse Analysis (PDA) of Covid-19 phenomenon (inspired by
Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory) by using Intelligent Data Mining for
Persian Society. The examined big data is five million tweets from 160,000
users of the Persian Twitter network to compare two discourses. Besides
analyzing the tweet texts individually, a social network graph database has
been created based on retweets relationships. We use the VoteRank algorithm to
introduce and rank people whose posts become word of mouth, provided that the
total information spreading scope is maximized over the network. These users
are also clustered according to their word usage pattern (the Gaussian Mixture
Model is used). The constructed discourse of influential spreaders is compared
to the most active users. This analysis is done based on Covid-related posts
over eight episodes. Also, by relying on the statistical content analysis and
polarity of tweet words, discourse analysis is done for the whole mentioned
subpopulations, especially for the top individuals. The most important result
of this research is that the Twitter subjects' discourse construction is
government-based rather than community-based. The analyzed Iranian society does
not consider itself responsible for the Covid-19 wicked problem, does not
believe in participation, and expects the government to solve all problems. The
most active and most influential users' similarity is that political, national,
and critical discourse construction is the predominant one. In addition to the
advantages of its research methodology, it is necessary to pay attention to the
study's limitations. Suggestion for future encounters of Iranian society with
similar crises is given. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00298 |