Assaying Large-scale Testing Models to Interpret COVID-19 Case Numbers

Large-scale testing is considered key to assess the state of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, the link between the reported case numbers and the true state of the pandemic remains elusive. We develop mathematical models based on competing hypotheses regarding this link, thereby providing differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Besserve, Michel, Buchholz, Simon, Schölkopf, Bernhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 03.12.2020
Subjects
Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
Statistics - Applications
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.48550/arxiv.2012.01912

Cover

More Information
Summary:Large-scale testing is considered key to assess the state of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, the link between the reported case numbers and the true state of the pandemic remains elusive. We develop mathematical models based on competing hypotheses regarding this link, thereby providing different prevalence estimates based on case numbers, and validate them by predicting SARS-CoV-2-attributed death rate trajectories. Assuming that individuals were tested based solely on a predefined risk of being infectious implies the absolute case numbers reflect the prevalence, but turned out to be a poor predictor, consistently overestimating growth rates at the beginning of two COVID-19 epidemic waves. In contrast, assuming that testing capacity is fully exploited performs better. This leads to using the percent-positive rate as a more robust indicator of epidemic dynamics, however we find it is subject to a saturation phenomenon that needs to be accounted for as the number of tests becomes larger.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01912