Data fusion methods for the heterogeneity of treatment effect and confounding function
The heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) lies at the heart of precision medicine. Randomized controlled trials are gold-standard for treatment effect estimation but are typically underpowered for heterogeneous effects. In contrast, large observational studies have high predictive power but are of...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
25.07.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.2007.12922 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) lies at the heart of precision
medicine. Randomized controlled trials are gold-standard for treatment effect
estimation but are typically underpowered for heterogeneous effects. In
contrast, large observational studies have high predictive power but are often
confounded due to the lack of randomization of treatment. We show that an
observational study, even subject to hidden confounding, may be used to empower
trials in estimating the HTE using the notion of confounding function. The
confounding function summarizes the impact of unmeasured confounders on the
difference between the observed treatment effect and the causal treatment
effect, given the observed covariates, which is unidentifiable based only on
the observational study. Coupling the trial and observational study, we show
that the HTE and confounding function are identifiable. We then derive the
semiparametric efficient scores and the integrative estimators of the HTE and
confounding function. We clarify the conditions under which the integrative
estimator of the HTE is strictly more efficient than the trial estimator.
Finally, we illustrate the integrative estimators via simulation and an
application. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2007.12922 |