Wikipedia and Westminster: Quality and Dynamics of Wikipedia Pages about UK Politicians

Wikipedia is a major source of information providing a large variety of content online, trusted by readers from around the world. Readers go to Wikipedia to get reliable information about different subjects, one of the most popular being living people, and especially politicians. While a lot is know...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Agarwal, Pushkal, Redi, Miriam, Sastry, Nishanth, Wood, Edward, Blick, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 23.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.48550/arxiv.2006.13400

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Wikipedia is a major source of information providing a large variety of content online, trusted by readers from around the world. Readers go to Wikipedia to get reliable information about different subjects, one of the most popular being living people, and especially politicians. While a lot is known about the general usage and information consumption on Wikipedia, less is known about the life-cycle and quality of Wikipedia articles in the context of politics. The aim of this study is to quantify and qualify content production and consumption for articles about politicians, with a specific focus on UK Members of Parliament (MPs). First, we analyze spatio-temporal patterns of readers' and editors' engagement with MPs' Wikipedia pages, finding huge peaks of attention during election times, related to signs of engagement on other social media (e.g. Twitter). Second, we quantify editors' polarisation and find that most editors specialize in a specific party and choose specific news outlets as references. Finally we observe that the average citation quality is pretty high, with statements on 'Early life and career' missing citations most often (18%).
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2006.13400