Algorithm-Based Fault Tolerance for Parallel Stencil Computations
The increase in HPC systems size and complexity, together with increasing on-chip transistor density, power limitations, and number of components, render modern HPC systems subject to soft errors. Silent data corruptions (SDCs) are typically caused by such soft errors in the form of bit-flips in the...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
02.09.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.1909.00709 |
Cover
Summary: | The increase in HPC systems size and complexity, together with increasing
on-chip transistor density, power limitations, and number of components, render
modern HPC systems subject to soft errors. Silent data corruptions (SDCs) are
typically caused by such soft errors in the form of bit-flips in the memory
subsystem and hinder the correctness of scientific applications. This work
addresses the problem of protecting a class of iterative computational kernels,
called stencils, against SDCs when executing on parallel HPC systems. Existing
SDC detection and correction methods are in general either inaccurate,
inefficient, or targeting specific application classes that do not include
stencils. This work proposes a novel algorithm-based fault tolerance (ABFT)
method to protect scientific applications that contain arbitrary stencil
computations against SDCs. The ABFT method can be applied both online and
offline to accurately detect and correct SDCs in 2D and 3D parallel stencil
computations. We present a formal model for the proposed method including
theorems and proofs for the computation of the associated checksums as well as
error detection and correction. We experimentally evaluate the use of the
proposed ABFT method on a real 3D stencil-based application (HotSpot3D) via a
fault-injection, detection, and correction campaign. Results show that the
proposed ABFT method achieves less than 8% overhead compared to the performance
of the unprotected stencil application. Moreover, it accurately detects and
corrects SDCs. While the offline ABFT version corrects errors more accurately,
it may incur a small additional overhead than its online counterpart. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1909.00709 |