Characteristic Characteristics
While five-factor models of personality are widespread, there is still not universal agreement on this as a structural framework. Part of the reason for the lingering debate is its dependence on factor analysis. In particular, derivation or refutation of the model via other statistical means is a wo...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
06.07.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.1107.1229 |
Cover
Summary: | While five-factor models of personality are widespread, there is still not
universal agreement on this as a structural framework. Part of the reason for
the lingering debate is its dependence on factor analysis. In particular,
derivation or refutation of the model via other statistical means is a
worthwhile project. In this paper we use the methodology of spectral clustering
to articulate the structure in the dataset of responses of 20,993 subjects on a
300-item item version of the IPIP NEO personality questionnaire, and we compare
our results to those obtained from a factor analytic solution. We found support
for five- and six-cluster solutions. The five-cluster solution was similar to a
conventional five-factor solution, but the six-cluster and six-factor solutions
differed significantly, and only the six-cluster solution was readily
interpretable: it gave a model similar to the HEXACO model. We suggest that
spectral clustering provides a robust alternative view of personality data. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1107.1229 |