Fighting Technology Dumb Down: Our Cognitive Capacity for Effortful AR Navigation Tools

By overlaying virtual guidance information directly over the surrounding environment, Augmented Reality (AR) is seen as an easy alternative to maps for pedestrians navigating in unfamiliar urban environments. It is hypothesized, however, that easing navigation tasks would result in weaker cognitive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services pp. 525 - 536
Main Authors Wen, James, Deneka, Agnes, Helton, William S., Dünser, Andreas, Billinghurst, Mark
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
augmented reality
cognitive load
pedestrian navigation
spatial knowledge acquisition
virtual environment
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:By overlaying virtual guidance information directly over the surrounding environment, Augmented Reality (AR) is seen as an easy alternative to maps for pedestrians navigating in unfamiliar urban environments. It is hypothesized, however, that easing navigation tasks would result in weaker cognitive maps, leaving users more vulnerable to becoming lost should their navigation device fail. We describe an outdoor navigation study that highlighted the gap between theoretical expectations and real world testing with navigation tools. We addressed the issues by creating a simulation system for testing navigation tools and report on the results of a study comparing AR with maps. We then extended the system to support simultaneous secondary tasks to assess relative workload. We present this as a way of objectively measuring relative cognitive effort expended on navigation tool use. Our findings are helpful in the design of mobile pedestrian navigation tools seeking to balance navigational efficiency with mental map formation.
ISBN:3319072269
9783319072265
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07227-2_50