A Warning: Potential Damages Induced by Playing XR Games

• Published in: HCI in Games pp. 260 - 270
• Main Authors: Binter, Jakub, Říha, Daniel, Prossinger, Hermann
• Format: Book Chapter
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing
• Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• Subjects: Augmented reality; Decision trees; Gamer safety and gamer wellbeing; Kernel density estimation; Neural networks; Psychoactive substances; PTSD; Virtual reality; VR gaming
• ISBN: 9783030501631; 3030501639
• ISSN: 0302-9743; 1611-3349
• DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50164-8_18

This article focuses on psychological safety while playing XR (VR + AR) games, and the development of safe-guards (‘fuses’) to avoid possible negative impacts incurred during virtual experiences. VR and AR have moved from hi-tech development laboratories and design studios into the homes of otherwise conventional users. XR technology has been repeatedly proven to be beneficial for supportive treatment of phobia, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), training of complex behaviors in harsh environments, and education related applications. Gaming applications are in high demand and financially successful, but are insufficiently supervised by professionals with regard to user safety. Immersion and quality of the technology has increased markedly, resulting in the emergence of arenas that look and feel increasingly realistic, and hence can trigger and impact human affectual states, notably fear and sexual pleasure, more easily. The tendency to create super-stimuli is in the minds of the creators with little (we argue: insufficient) regard to deleterious side effects. Motion sickness has been considered a negative side-effect of VR gaming, but the possible damage to emotional and psychological well-being of users has been overlooked. Other media platforms, such as movies, have documented the impact on the human psyche of pre-disposed individuals, especially when their psychological state is affected by psychoactive substances. We argue the necessity of programming psycho-physiological response-based ‘fuses’ that limit possible negative impacts on individuals with pre-existing or pre-generated conditions. We do not criticize XR development trends or claim that XR is dangerous outright, and we suspect that various benefits could far outweigh the risks. The warning call we publish here should help establish safety measures while not diminishing the enjoyment during XR gaming.