THE MEANING AND COHERENCE OF PROCESS, ORGANISATION AND PRODUCT IN ENGINEERING DESIGN
Real design processes show a qualitative discrepancy to planned processes. There is also a large gap between processes and organisation structures. Understanding of product development as a complex social system, with a system theory background, gives insights into this issue. It seems that communic...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of integrated design & process science Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 55 - 66 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Real design processes show a qualitative discrepancy to planned
processes. There is also a large gap between processes and organisation
structures. Understanding of product development as a complex social system,
with a system theory background, gives insights into this issue. It seems that
communication is more important than a controlled and transparent process. A
dynamic organisa-tion with self-organising teams seems to be the more
appropriate approach for process management in product development.
Communication partly takes place via money. We will discuss why money cannot be
used as a measure for process quality yet, but how it could be used. The paper
also gives an impression how signposting and design structure matrices (DSMs)
can contribute to this approach. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1092-0617 1875-8959 |
DOI: | 10.3233/JID-2005-9105 |