Effects of Task and Presentation Modality in Detection Response Tasks

To assess driver distraction adequately, cognitive workload measurement techniques are necessary that can be used as part of standard in-vehicle testing procedures. Detection response tasks (DRTs) are a simple and effective way of assessing workload. However, as DRTs require cognitive resources them...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEngineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition pp. 177 - 185
Main Authors Vilimek, Roman, Schäfer, Juliane, Keinath, Andreas
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN9783642393594
3642393594
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_20

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess driver distraction adequately, cognitive workload measurement techniques are necessary that can be used as part of standard in-vehicle testing procedures. Detection response tasks (DRTs) are a simple and effective way of assessing workload. However, as DRTs require cognitive resources themselves, interferences between task modality and DRT modality are possible. In this study, DRT stimuli (auditory, visual, tactile) are varied systematically with secondary task presentation modality (auditory, visual, or purely cognitive tasks). The aim is to infer if different DRT variants remain sensitive to changes in workload even if primary and secondary task convey information using the same presentation modality, thus making resource conflicts likely. Results show that all DRTs successfully discriminate between high and low workload levels in terms of reaction time independent of DRT presentation modality. Differences in discriminability can be found in hit rate measurement.
ISBN:9783642393594
3642393594
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_20