Comparative effects of two multispecies directfed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 98; no. 9; pp. 1 - 11
• Main Authors: Ogunade, Ibukun M, McCoun, Megan, Idowu, Modoluwamu D, Peters, Sunday O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Champaign Oxford University Press 01.09.2020
• Subjects: Abundance; Amino acids; Ammonia; Bacteria; Beef; Body weight; Diet; Dietary supplements; Digestibility; Energy balance; Fatty acids; Fermentation; Glucose; Lactic acid; Microorganisms; Nutrient status; Nutrients; Nutrition; Prevotella; Prevotellaceae; Propionic acid; Relative abundance; Ruminococcaceae; Volatile fatty acids
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa201

We examined the effects of two direct-fed microbials (DFM) containing multiple microbial species and their fermentation products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers. Nine ruminally cannulated Holstein steers (mean ± SD body weight: 243 ± 12.4 kg) were assigned to three treatments arranged in a triplicated 3 x 3 Latin square design with three 21-d periods. Dietary treatments were 1) control (CON; basal diet), 2) Commence (PROB; basal diet plus 19 g/d of Commence), and 3) RX3 (SYNB; basal diet plus 28 g/d of RX3). Commence and RX3 are both multispecies DFM products. From day 16 to 20 of each period, feed and fecal samples were collected daily to determine the apparent total tract digestibilities of nutrients using indigestible neutral detergent fiber method. On day 21 of each period, blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acid. Ruminal contents were collected at approximately 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 h after feeding on day 21 for analysis of volatile fatty acids (VFA), lactate, ammonia-N concentrations, bacterial community, and metabolome profile. Total tract digestibilities of nutrients did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments. Compared with CON, steers fed either supplemental PROB or SYNB had greater (P = 0.04) plasma glucose concentrations. Compared with CON, total ruminal VFA, propionate, isovalerate, and valerate concentrations increased (P < 0.05) or tended to increase (P < 0.10) with either supplemental PROB or SYNB, but were not different (P > 0.05) between PROB and SYNB. Compared with CON, PROB reduced (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 1 and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 but increased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae RC9, Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001, Succiniclasticum, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-002. Supplemental SYNB decreased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 1 and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 but increased (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 7, Succinivibrio, Succiniclasticum, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-014. Compared with CON, metabolome analysis revealed that some amino acids were increased (P < 0.05) in steers fed PROB. This study demonstrated that, compared with CON, supplementation of either PROB or SYNB altered the ruminal bacterial community and metabolome differently; however, their effects on the ruminal VFA profile and energy status of the steers were not different from each other.