The Strategic Technology Options for Mitigating CO sub(2) Emissions in Power Sector: Assessment of Shanghai Electricity-Generating System

In this paper, the strategic technology options, especially the potential role of natural gas combined cycle and nuclear power plants, in mitigation of CO sub(2) emission in electricity sector in China are assessed. We analyse the influence of different power generation technologies on CO sub(2) emi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcological economics Vol. 50; no. 1-2; pp. 117 - 133
Main Authors Gnansounou, E, Dong, J, Bedniaguine, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.09.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, the strategic technology options, especially the potential role of natural gas combined cycle and nuclear power plants, in mitigation of CO sub(2) emission in electricity sector in China are assessed. We analyse the influence of different power generation technologies on CO sub(2) emission volume and abatement cost based on energy market and electricity demand prospects, and least-cost expansion of electricity generating system. In the latter model, we take into account electricity supply quality and CO sub(2) emission. The CO sub(2) abatement cost is estimated in a period of time rather than the traditional abatement cost estimation performed for a target year. The proposed model is applied to the case of Shanghai Municipality in China to assess potential role of natural gas combined cycle and nuclear power plants in mitigation of CO sub(2) emission. Impact of the baseline technology choice on CO sub(2) abatement cost is analysed through the formulation of three scenarios. For the first one ("Baseline" scenario), it is assumed that expansion of the electricity supply system is based only on coal-fired power plants; for the second scenario, it is supposed that the decision makers have already envisaged the use of natural gas combined cycle power plants (CCPP) in addition to coal fired ones; the third scenario mixes coal-fired, natural gas CCPP and nuclear power plants. It is found that on the horizon of the study (2020), maximum CO sub(2) emission mitigation potential of natural gas CCPPs can reach 42.4 million tons (MtCO sub(2)), whereas maximum CO sub(2) emission reduction potential of nuclear power plants can be 298.2 MtCO sub(2). The CO sub(2) abatement cost estimation falls into the range from US$19/tCO sub(2) to US$51/tCO sub(2) depending on the level of imposed CO sub(2) penalty, volume of carbon emission reduction and baseline technology choice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0921-8009
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.028