Barriers to and facilitators to endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study

• Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
• Main Authors: Graham, Kristin, Banwell, Helen A, Causby, Ryan S, Kumar, Saravana, Tian, Esther Jie, Nissen, Lisa
• Format: Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: Durham Research Square 17.12.2020
• Subjects: Endorsements; Mentoring; Podiatry; Qualitative research
• DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-129425/v1

Background Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators for engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. Methods Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. Conclusion A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.