Dynamics of mRNA fate during light stress and recovery: from transcription to stability and translation

• Published in: bioRxiv
• Main Authors: Smith, Aaron B, Ganguly, Diep R, Moore, Marten, Bowerman, Andrew F, Janapala, Yoshika, Shirokikh, Nikolay, Pogson, Barry J, Crisp, Peter A
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 07.02.2023
• Subjects: Arabidopsis; Environmental conditions; Gene regulation; Hypotheses; Leaves; Light; mRNA stability; Post-transcription; Translation
• DOI: 10.1101/2022.06.10.495589

Transcript stability is an important determinant of its abundance and, consequently, translation. However, it is unclear the extent to which it is modulated between environmental conditions. We previously hypothesised that recovery-induced transcript destabilisation facilitated a phenomenon of rapid recovery gene down-regulation (RRGD) in Arabidopsis thaliana following stress, based on mathematical calculations to account for ongoing transcription. Here, we test this hypothesis, and investigate processes regulating transcript abundance and fate, by quantifying changes in transcription, stability, and translation before, during, and after light stress. We adapt syringe infiltration to apply a transcriptional inhibitor to soil-grown plants in combination with stress. Compared to measurements in juvenile plants and cell culture, we find reduced stability in a range of transcripts. We also observe transcript destabilisation during light stress, followed by stabilisation upon recovery. Alongside fast transcriptional shut-off in recovery, this destabilisation appears to facilitate RRGD. Translation was dynamic over the course of light stress and recovery, with substantial transcript-specific increases in ribosome-association, independent of changes in total transcript abundance, observed after 30 minutes of light stress. Taken together, we provide evidence for the combinatorial regulation of transcription, stability, and translation that occurs to facilitate responses to light stress and recovery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Footnotes* Incorporated suggestions on data presentation, data analysis, and strength of conclusions, as a result of peer review at The Plant Cell. Reviewed and amended author list.* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE201015