A Systematic Evaluation of the Computational Tools for Ligand-receptor-based Cell-Cell Interaction Inference
Cell-cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. Many molecules and signaling processes can mediate CCIs. One classical type of CCI mediator is the interaction between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e., ligand-r...
Saved in:
Published in | bioRxiv |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
Cold Spring Harbor
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
08.04.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Cell-cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. Many molecules and signaling processes can mediate CCIs. One classical type of CCI mediator is the interaction between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e., ligand-receptor (LR) interaction. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used fifteen mouse scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to nearly 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1101/2022.04.05.487237 |