Tissue volume estimation and age prediction using rapid structural brain scans

• Published in: bioRxiv
• Main Authors: Hobday, Harriet, Cole, James H, Stanyard, Ryan A, Daws, Richard E, Giampietro, Vincent, O'daly, Owen, Leech, Robert, Váša, František
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 21.01.2022
• Subjects: Age; Age determination; Automation; Cerebrospinal fluid; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroimaging; Scanning; Substantia alba; Substantia grisea
• DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.19.476615

The multicontrast EPImix sequence generates 6 contrasts, including a T1-weighted scan, in ~1 minute. EPImix shows comparable diagnostic performance to conventional scans under qualitative clinical evaluation, and similarities in simple quantitative measures including contrast intensity. However, EPImix scans have not yet been compared to standard MRI scans using established quantitative measures. In this study, we compared conventional and EPImix-derived T1-weighted scans of 64 healthy participants using tissue volume estimates and predicted brain-age. All scans were pre-processed using the SPM12 DARTEL pipeline, generating measures of grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid volume. Brain-age was predicted using brainageR, a Gaussian process regression model previously trained on a large sample of standard T1-weighted scans. Estimates of both global and voxel-wise tissue volume showed significantly similar results between standard and EPImix-derived T1-weighted scans. Brain-age estimates from both sequences were significantly correlated, although EPImix T1-weighted scans showed a systematic offset in predictions of chronological age. Supplementary analyses suggest that this is likely caused by the reduced field-of-view of EPImix scans, and the use of a brain-age model trained using conventional T1-weighted scans. However, this systematic error can be corrected using additional regression of T1-predicted brain-age onto EPImix-predicted brain-age. Finally, retest EPImix scans acquired for 10 participants demonstrated high test-retest reliability in all evaluated quantitative measurements. Quantitative analysis of EPImix scans holds potential to reduce scanning time, increasing participant comfort and reducing cost, as well as to support automation of scanning, utilising active learning for faster and individually-tailored (neuro)imaging. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://github.com/frantisekvasa/epimix_volume_brain_age * https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18128225