Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong

• Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
• Main Authors: Loong, Herbert, Wong, Carlos K H, Leung, Linda K S, Chan, Catherine P K, Chang, Andrea, Zheng-yi, Zhou, Xie, Jipan, Gibbs, Meaghan
• Format: Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: Durham Research Square 14.08.2020
• Subjects: Cost analysis; Lung cancer; Lymphoma; Hong Kong China; China
• DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-17823/v2

Introduction: Lower-dose ceritinib (450mg) once-daily with food was approved in 2018 in Hong Kong (HK) for first-line treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ALK+ NSCLC from a HK healthcare service provider's or government's perspective. Methods: Costs and effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs. crizotinib over a 20-year time horizon was evaluated using a partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressed disease, and death). The efficacy data for ceritinib were obtained from a phase 3 trial comparing ceritinib with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4) and extrapolated using parametric survival models. Long-term survival associated with crizotinib were estimated using hazard ratio of crizotinib vs. ceritinib obtained from matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014 trials. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events costs, and medical costs associated with each health state were obtained from public sources and converted to 2018 US Dollars. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained were estimated for ceritinib vs. crizotinib. Results: The base case results showed that ceritinib was associated with 3.22 QALYs, 4.51 LYs, and total costs of $157,581 over 20 years. Patients receiving crizotinib had 2.68 QALYs, 3.85 LYs, and $150,424 total costs over the same time horizon. The incremental cost per QALY gained for ceritinib vs crizotinib was $13,343. Results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses in most scenarios. Conclusion: Ceritinib offers a cost-effective option compared to crizotinib for previously untreated ALK+ advanced NCSLC in HK.