Fostering Teaching-Learning through Workplace Based Assessment in Postgraduate Chemical Pathology Residency Program Using Virtual Learning Environment

• Published in: BMC Medical Education
• Main Authors: Jafri, Lena, Siddiqui, Imran, Aysha Habib Khan, Tariq, Muhammed, Muhammad Umer Naeem Effendi, Naseem, Azra, Sibtain Ahmed, Ghani, Farooq, Alidina, Shahnila, Shah, Nadir, Majid, Hafsa
• Format: Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: Durham Research Square 31.03.2020
• Subjects: Acceptability; Disorders; Feedback; Learning environment; Perceptions; Teaching methods; Time
• DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-19512/v1

Background The principle of workplace based assessment (WBA) is to assess trainees at work with feedback integrated into the program simultaneously. A student driven WBA model was introduced and perception evaluation of this teaching method was done subsequently by taking feedback from the faculty as well as the postgraduate trainees (PGs) of a residency program. Methods Descriptive mixed method study was conducted. A WBA program was designed for PGs in Chemical Pathology on MOODLE and forms utilized were Case-based discussion (CBD), Direct Observation of Practical Skills (DOPS) and Evaluation of clinical events (ECE). Consented assessors and PGs were trained on WBA through a workshop. Pretest and post-test to assess PGs knowledge before and after WBA were conducted. Every time a WBA form was filled, perception of PGs and assessors towards WBA, time taken to conduct single WBA and feedback were recorded. Faculty and PGs qualitative feedback on perception of WBA was taken via interviews. WBA tools data and qualitative feedback were used to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the new tools. Results Six eligible PGs and seventeen assessors participated in this study. A total of 79 CBDs (assessors n=7 and PGs n=6), 12 ECEs (assessors n=6 and PGs n=5), and 20 DOPS (assessors n=6 and PGs n=6) were documented. PGs average pretest score was 55.6%, which was improved to 96.4% in posttest. Overall mean time taken to evaluate PG’s was 12.6±9.9 min and feedback time 9.2±7.4 min. Mean WBA process satisfaction of assessors and PGs on likert scale of 1 to 10 was 8±1 and 8.3±0.8 respectively. Conclusion Both assessors and fellows were satisfied with introduction and implementation of WBA. It gave the fellows opportunity to interact with assessors more often and learn from their rich experience.