The Many Meanings of Collective Action: Lessons on Enhancing Gender Inclusion and Equity in Watershed Management
Collective action in agriculture and natural resource management is all too often perceived of in terms of the mere number of participants, with little consideration given to who participates, why, and the outcomes of inequitable participation. The literature is replete with cases of how uncritical...
Saved in:
Published in | Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
St. Paul
Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA)
01.01.2006
|
Edition | 577 |
Series | 52 CAPRi Working Paper |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Collective action in agriculture and natural resource management is all too often
perceived of in terms of the mere number of participants, with little consideration given to
who participates, why, and the outcomes of inequitable participation. The literature is replete
with cases of how uncritical approaches to participation structure positions of privilege vis-a-vis
project benefits and the natural resource base. Yet lessons on how to engage with local
communities in ways that promote equitable participation of women, the poor and other
stakeholders are only now coming to light. This paper focuses on approaches under
development under the rubric of the African Highlands Initiative to bring collective action
principles to bear on gender-equitable change processes in natural resource management.
The paper utilizes a number of case studies to illustrate the relative strengths and weaknesses
of different approaches for enhancing gender inclusion and equity throughout the stages of
problem diagnosis, planning and monitoring. The analysis suggests that an arbitrary
definition of collective action is insufficient for assessing the relative strengths and
weaknesses of different approaches, and that method evaluation should consider the different
forms that collective action can take. A typology of different forms of collective action is
proposed, and then utilized to assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of different
approaches for fostering gender inclusion and equity in watershed management. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.22004/ag.econ.42495 |