Stock measurement and regeneration policy approaches to ahardcorea brownfield sites: England and Japan compared

This paper discusses key contextual differences and similarities in a comparative study on brownfield regeneration in England and Japan. Over the last decade, the regeneration of large-scale aflagshipa projects has been a primary focus in England, and previous research has discussed policy issues an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLand use policy Vol. 33; pp. 36 - 41
Main Authors Otsuka, Noriko, Dixon, Timothy, Abe, Hirokazu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.07.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper discusses key contextual differences and similarities in a comparative study on brownfield regeneration in England and Japan. Over the last decade, the regeneration of large-scale aflagshipa projects has been a primary focus in England, and previous research has discussed policy issues and key barriers at these sites. However, further research is required to explore specific barriers associated with problematic ahardcorea sites suffering from long-term dereliction due to site-specific obstacles such as contamination and fragmented ownership. In comparison with England, brownfield regeneration is a relatively new urban agenda in Japan. Japan has less experience in terms of promoting redevelopment of brownfield sites at national level and the specific issues of ahardcorea sites have been under-researched. The paper reviews and highlights important issues in comparing the definitions, national policy frameworks and the current stock of brownfields.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0264-8377
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.002