MEDICAL DISCOURSE ON THE IMPERATIVE OF THE NATURAL WITHIN CONTRACEPTION IN THE CASE OF COITUS INTERRUPTUS

The aim of the study was to determine gynaecologists' views and opinions on the imperative of the natural within contraception in the case of coitus interruptus. A qualitative study on contraception and coitus interruptus, which included 27 semi-structured in-depth interviews with gynaecologist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocialno Delo Vol. 53; no. 6; p. 335
Main Author Simetinger, Gabrijela
Format Journal Article
LanguageSlovenian
Published 01.12.2014
Subjects
Birth Control
Discourse
Females
Medicine
Slovenia
Trust
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of the study was to determine gynaecologists' views and opinions on the imperative of the natural within contraception in the case of coitus interruptus. A qualitative study on contraception and coitus interruptus, which included 27 semi-structured in-depth interviews with gynaecologists from various geographical parts of Slovenia, was carried out between December 2010 and May 2011. Many gynaecologists believe in the imperative of the natural and trust natural methods of contraception, where they also place coitus interruptus. Due to their personal views and opinions, a significant number of gynaecologists, mainly female, still recommend natural methods of contraception despite the opposing medical doctrine. Thus, personal gynaecologists' views and opinions dominate when it comes to choosing a contraceptive method. Female gynaecologists proved to be carriers of traditional sexual culture by promoting traditional methods of contraception. Adapted from the source document.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0352-7956