Indian Country Today, Oneida, N.Y., guest column

Jul. 28--RENDERING THE NLRB UNNECESSARY: As has been written in these pages, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision in San Manuel Indian Casino and Bingo is troubling and arrogant and it violates the most sacred tenet the U.S. government claims to honor: The consent of the governed. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKnight Ridder Tribune Business News p. 1
Main Author Coin, Jacob L
Format Newsletter
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Tribune Content Agency LLC 19.05.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Jul. 28--RENDERING THE NLRB UNNECESSARY: As has been written in these pages, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision in San Manuel Indian Casino and Bingo is troubling and arrogant and it violates the most sacred tenet the U.S. government claims to honor: The consent of the governed. The NLRB ruled that when tribes operate "typically commercial" enterprises, employ a large number of non- Indians and entertain non-Indian customers, those enterprises are subject to NLRB jurisdiction. Politicizing and codifying those rights that are usually viewed in economic terms will more clearly illustrate the unnecessary federal intrusion. (While the NLRB asserted its jurisdiction in spite of the San Manuel Tribe's labor relations ordinance, it is unlikely that the NLRB will have the last say on this matter.) There may be other creative methods to strengthen the ties between self- government and conditions of employment. Employees entering Indian country to work for a tribe are essentially another political and economic constituency. When nations are in conflict, as the tribes and the U.S. are now in many instances, each side seeks the support of relevant constituencies. Employees in Indian country will choose the "better" nation for them, based on a variety of factors.