Appropriateness in Cardiology: a statement of the ANMCO Veneto Region

• Published in: Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006) Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 24
• Main Authors: Zuin, Guerrino, Frigo, Gianfranco, Roncon, Loris, Bonso, Aldo, Carbonieri, Emanuele, Chirillo, Fabio, De Conti, Fabio, Delise, Pietro, Desideri, Alessandro, D'Este, Daniele, Milani, Loredano, Valle, Roberto, Bilato, Claudio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Italian
• Published: Italy 01.01.2018
• ISSN: 1827-6806
• DOI: 10.1714/2852.28776

Inappropriate tests are responsible for longer waiting lists, higher economical costs for the National Health System and major clinical risks due to radiation exposure from prescription abuse of diagnostic testing. Clinical inappropriateness frequently derives from poor knowledge of guidelines, "defensive medicine" approach and/or repeat requests of patients and family members. About one third of non-invasive imaging tests are considered inappropriate.In order to define the most appropriate instruments for the follow-up of the most common cardiovascular diseases with the highest risk of inappropriateness, all the cardiologists of the Veneto Region (Italy), along with the local chapters of the main national cardiology societies and general practitioners have been involved by the Regional Section of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) in several scientific meetings on the following topics: hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. This has led to the present document where: (i) the most appropriate clinical and diagnostic strategies are taken into account, and (ii) the most robust scientific evidence is provided for the regulatory commission of the Veneto Region Health Service to identify inappropriateness, prescription unsuitability, and economical sustainability.