Variability between experts in defining the edge and area of the optic nerve head

Estimation of the error rate in the subjective determination of the optic nerve head edge and area. 1) 169 images of optic nerve disc were evaluated by five experts for the defining of the edges in 8 positions (every 45°). 2) The estimated areas of 26 cases were compared with the measurements of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología Vol. 88; no. 5; pp. 168 - 173
Main Authors Alayon, S, Gonzalez de la Rosa, M, Fumero, F J, Sigut Saavedra, J F, Sanchez, J L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Spanish
Published Spain 01.05.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Estimation of the error rate in the subjective determination of the optic nerve head edge and area. 1) 169 images of optic nerve disc were evaluated by five experts for the defining of the edges in 8 positions (every 45°). 2) The estimated areas of 26 cases were compared with the measurements of the Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT-Cirrus). 1) The mean variation of the estimated radius was ±5.2%, with no significant differences between sectors. Specific differences were found between the 5 experts (P <.001), each one compared with the others. 2) The disc area measured by the OCT-Cirros was 1.78 mm² (SD =0.27). The results corresponding to the experts who detected smaller areas were better correlated to the area detected by the OCT-Cirrus (r=0.77-0.88) than the results corresponding to larger areas (r =0.61-0.69) (P <.05 in extreme cases). There are specific patterns in each expert for defining the disc edges and involve 20% variation in the estimation of the optic nerve area. The experts who detected smaller areas have a higher agreement with the objective method used. A web tool is proposed for self-assessment and training in this task.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1989-7286
DOI:10.1016/j.oftal.2012.07.008