Experimental investigation of efficacy and safety of different methods of endoscopic hemostasis

Treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleedings remains one of the most pressing problems in urgent surgery. Available methods of endoscopic hemostasis are not fully eligible to safety requirements, effectiveness and reliability. In this connection persist high levels of general and postoperative m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inĖksperimental'nai͡a︡ i klinicheskai͡a︡ gastroėnterologii͡a no. 10; p. 20
Main Authors Cherepanin, A I, Antonov, O N, Sineokaia, M S
Format Journal Article
LanguageRussian
Published Russia (Federation) 2013
Subjects
Animals
Disease Models, Animal
Electrocoagulation - methods
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
Epinephrine - administration & dosage
Epinephrine - therapeutic use
Hemostasis, Endoscopic - methods
Male
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - pathology
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - therapy
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Treatment Outcome
Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage
Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Treatment of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleedings remains one of the most pressing problems in urgent surgery. Available methods of endoscopic hemostasis are not fully eligible to safety requirements, effectiveness and reliability. In this connection persist high levels of general and postoperative mortality in our country and around the world. The aim of this study is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic radiofrequency effects in comparison with standard techniques of hemostasis, used in the treatment of ulcer bleeding in the world practice.
ISSN:1682-8658