Comparison of BESA and RAI: evaluating the outcomes of two assessment instruments for long-term residential care needs

In Switzerland, the level of nursing care required for residents in nursing homes is either assessed by the BESA Catalogue 2010 or by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). Within both instruments the nursing care need is represented in minutes. According to these mi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPflege Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 31
Main Authors Gattinger, Heidrun, Ott, Stefan, Saxer, Susi
Format Journal Article
LanguageGerman
Published Switzerland 01.02.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Switzerland, the level of nursing care required for residents in nursing homes is either assessed by the BESA Catalogue 2010 or by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). Within both instruments the nursing care need is represented in minutes. According to these minutes, the resident is allocated to a tariff level. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of the two assessment instruments BESA Catalogue 2010 and MDS. For this purpose data were collected in two nursing homes. At each facility 60 nursing home residents were assessed with the BESA Catalogue 2010 and the MDS. The assessments were independently performed by nurses of the facility (internal assessment) and by system experts (external assessment). Descriptive data analysis and a comparison of the outcome in minutes and with regard to tariff level were carried out. In average, internal assessments were higher than external assessments. In both nursing homes, half or 54 % of residents were allocated into a higher tariff level by means of internal assessment. Comparing the outcomes in total and within tariff level, significant differences were found. Different classifications may occur, especially for residents with high nursing care needs. As a result, higher or lower costs of nursing care may arise.
ISSN:1012-5302
DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000337