De vuelta a la clínica. Métodos I. Diseños de investigación. Mayor calidad de información, mayor certeza a la respuesta

• Published in: Gaceta médica de México Vol. 155; no. 4; p. 399
• Main Authors: Talavera, Juan O, Roy-García, Ivonne, Palacios-Cruz, Lino, Rivas-Ruiz, Rodolfo, Hoyo, Irma, Pérez-Rodríguez, Marcela
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Mexico 2019
• Subjects: Bias; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods; Clinical Trials as Topic - standards; Cohort Studies; Data Accuracy; Data Collection - methods; Epidemiologic Studies; Humans; Research Design; Ensamble; Biases; Designs; Diseños; Maniobra; Pesquisa; Maneuver; Inquiry; Sesgos; Assembly
• ISSN: 0016-3813
• DOI: 10.24875/GMM.19005226

Research designs refer to the way information is obtained and are limited by ethical, economic and temporal viability. Research designs are standardized strategies to reduce biases, which in the architectural model of research are identified in the baseline state, the maneuver and the outcome; hence, there are no specific designs for each question. The design with the lowest probability of bias is the clinical trial, followed by cohort and case-control studies and, finally, by cross-sectional surveys. Among the main characteristics that give merit to research designs are the following: population inquiry, which refers to the situation of the population in relation to the clinical course/natural history of the disease; the maneuver, or action that is expected to modify the baseline state, which can be observational or experimental; follow-up, or documented monitoring that is given to each subject, which can be longitudinal or cross-sectional; and directionality, which can prolective or retrolective and refers to the timing of data collection for research purposes. It will always be better having a valuable question, even when answered with a design with higher risk of bias, than a question that is irrelevant or has no applicability.