Transesophageal echocardiography in an emergency setting. A district general hospital experience

• Published in: Revista portuguesa de cardiologia Vol. 24; no. 7-8; p. 971
• Main Authors: Peres, Marisa, Pitta, Maria da Luz, Alcaravela, Jorge, Aranha, Júlio, Martins, Vítor Paulo, Monteiro, Isabel, da Silva, Graça Ferreira
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: Portugal 01.07.2005
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Emergencies; Female; Hospitals, General; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 0870-2551

Transesophageal echocardiography is an extremely useful technique for the study of various cardiovascular pathologies. In the particular setting of emergency, it is of great value for prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy. It was our aim to evaluate, in our hospital, the benefits obtained by the use of transesophageal echocardiography in an emergency setting. We retrospectively studied patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in an emergency setting, from June 1997 to December 2002, evaluating demographic characteristics, indication to perform TEE, benefit obtained (diagnosis or exclusion of initial diagnosis), and technique-related complications. There were 97 transesophageal echocardiograms performed in an emergency setting in the period under consideration, accounting for 19.3% of the total number of exams. Fifty-two patients (53.6%) were male, mean age 63.9 +/- 12.7. Nineteen patients (19.6%) were on assisted ventilation. The indications to perform TEE were: possible massive or submassive pulmonary thromboembolism in 32 patients (33.0%); suspected aortic dissection in 19 (19.6%); shock with inconclusive transthoracic echocardiogram in ten (10.3%); possible endocarditis in eight (8.2%); possible prosthetic valve dysfunction in seven (7.2%); intracardiac mass in six (6.2%); search for cardiac source of embolism in five (5.2%); possible mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction in four (4.1%); pre-electrical cardioversion study in four patients with atrial fibrillation (4.1%); and suspected congenital heart disease in two (2.1%). TEE examination yielded additional information and helped in the therapeutic decision in 88 patients (90.7%), leading to a diagnosis in 49 (50.6%), which was different from the initial diagnostic hypothesis in four, and exclusion of the suspected diagnosis in 39 (40.1%). There was only one minor complication (1.0%) and no TEE-related mortality. We concluded that transesophageal echocardiography is an extremely useful and safe cardiovascular diagnostic technique in an emergency setting in a district general hospital, enabling a diagnosis to be reached or excluded in almost all patients, which is essential for implementing appropriate therapy.