Opinion of university professors on the suitability of specific primary care training in medical students

• Published in: Atención primaria Vol. 15; no. 3; p. 179
• Main Authors: Gil, V F, Quirce, F, Orozco, D, Uris, J, Simón-Talero, M, Merino, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 28.02.1995
• Subjects: Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Curriculum; Education, Medical; Faculty; Humans; Middle Aged; Primary Health Care
• ISSN: 0212-6567

To find the opinion of teachers at the University of Alicante about the appropriateness of a Primary Care Theory-Practice programme within the Medicine curriculum. A descriptive observation study of a crossover nature. Teachers of the Departments of Medicine and Public Health who had had contact with the Primary Care Theory-Practice programme. 44 out of 71 teachers (62%) replied. An 11-question survey was answered anonymously between October 1993 and June 1994. 77.3% (95% Confidence Interval 64.9-89.7%) considered appropriate the theoretical content at undergraduate level, where there was an average 18.5 hours teaching (C.I. 15.8-21.2); and 95.5% (C.I.89.4-100%), the practicals at a Health Centre, where there was an average 65.2 hours (C.I. 43.1-87.3) work. 43.9% thought it was appropriate to form a separate subject and 39% favored integrating these themes into other subjects. Theoretical contents would be basically teaching general information about Primary Care; and practical work would be clinical activities. The greatest advantages regarding carrying out practical work in Health Centres were: the student finds pathology more prevalent and learns to provide practical answers. The greatest disadvantages were: the low methodological knowledge and teaching preparation of the Teams. Those interviewed considered that the teaching at undergraduate level of a Primary Care subject with theoretical-practical content would be useful. The advantages, its contents and some difficulties were noted.