Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system

Perinatal mortality rates were determined for all public maternity hospitals in New Zealand for the years 1978-1981. Level 1 maternity hospitals-mostly small rural units staffed by general practitioners and midwives-had lower birth-weight-specific perinatal mortality rates in all but the lowest birt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet (British edition) Vol. 2; no. 8452; p. 429
Main Authors Rosenblatt, R A, Reinken, J, Shoemack, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 24.08.1985
Subjects
Birth Weight
Female
Fetal Death
Hospital Bed Capacity
Humans
Infant Mortality
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
New Zealand
Pregnancy
New Zealand
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Perinatal mortality rates were determined for all public maternity hospitals in New Zealand for the years 1978-1981. Level 1 maternity hospitals-mostly small rural units staffed by general practitioners and midwives-had lower birth-weight-specific perinatal mortality rates in all but the lowest birth-weight categories than the better equipped hospitals to which they refer. This probably reflects the cautious antenatal practices of general practitioners, and the effective regionalisation of perinatal services in New Zealand. It is also possible that there is an advantage, particularly for normal birth-weight children, in being born in smaller obstetric units. There is no evidence that a satisfactory outcome depends on a minimum number of deliveries.
ISSN:0140-6736