Enhanced subject‐specific resting‐state network detection and extraction with fast fMRI

Resting‐state networks have become an important tool for the study of brain function. An ultra‐fast imaging technique that allows to measure brain function, called Magnetic Resonance Encephalography (MREG), achieves an order of magnitude higher temporal resolution than standard echo‐planar imaging (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 817 - 830
Main Authors Akin, Burak, Lee, Hsu‐Lei, Hennig, Jürgen, LeVan, Pierre
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Resting‐state networks have become an important tool for the study of brain function. An ultra‐fast imaging technique that allows to measure brain function, called Magnetic Resonance Encephalography (MREG), achieves an order of magnitude higher temporal resolution than standard echo‐planar imaging (EPI). This new sequence helps to correct physiological artifacts and improves the sensitivity of the fMRI analysis. In this study, EPI is compared with MREG in terms of capability to extract resting‐state networks. Healthy controls underwent two consecutive resting‐state scans, one with EPI and the other with MREG. Subject‐level independent component analyses (ICA) were performed separately for each of the two datasets. Using Stanford FIND atlas parcels as network templates, the presence of ICA maps corresponding to each network was quantified in each subject. The number of detected individual networks was significantly higher in the MREG data set than for EPI. Moreover, using short time segments of MREG data, such as 50 seconds, one can still detect and track consistent networks. Fast fMRI thus results in an increased capability to extract distinct functional regions at the individual subject level for the same scan times, and also allow the extraction of consistent networks within shorter time intervals than when using EPI, which is notably relevant for the analysis of dynamic functional connectivity fluctuations. Hum Brain Mapp 38:817–830, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.23420