Blowing smoke

Mandatory disclaimers in advertising do not protect consumers and are an infringement on free speech, Kesten Green and J. Scott Armstrong argue.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReview (Institute of Public Affairs (Australia) : 1997) Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 28 - 29
Main Authors Green, Kesten C, Armstrong, J Scott
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne Institute of Public Affairs 01.08.2013
Subjects
Advertising
Bill of Rights-US
Commercial speech
Consumer protection
Dentistry
Dentists
Disclaimers
Federal regulation
First Amendment-US
Freedom of speech
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Mandatory disclaimers in advertising do not protect consumers and are an infringement on free speech, Kesten Green and J. Scott Armstrong argue.
Bibliography:RevIPA_c.jpg
Institute of Public Affairs Review: A Quarterly Review of Politics and Public Affairs, The, Vol. 65, No. 2, Aug 2013: 28-29
ISSN:1329-8100
1836-1889