3D quantitative synthetic MRI‐derived cortical thickness and subcortical brain volumes: Scan–rescan repeatability and comparison with conventional T1‐weighted images

• Published in: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 50; no. 6; pp. 1834 - 1842
• Main Authors: Fujita, Shohei, Hagiwara, Akifumi, Hori, Masaaki, Warntjes, Marcel, Kamagata, Koji, Fukunaga, Issei, Goto, Masami, Takuya, Haruyama, Takasu, Kohei, Andica, Christina, Maekawa, Tomoko, Takemura, Mariko Yoshida, Irie, Ryusuke, Wada, Akihiko, Suzuki, Michimasa, Aoki, Shigeki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2019; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Agreements; Brain; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Cortex; Evaluation; Field strength; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroimaging; Original Research; Reproducibility; Statistical analysis; Statistical tests; Thickness measurement; Volumetric analysis
• ISSN: 1053-1807; 1522-2586; 1522-2586
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26744

Background Previous quantitative synthetic MRI of the brain has been solely performed in 2D. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of the recently developed sequence 3D‐QALAS for brain cortical thickness and volumetric analysis. Study Type Reproducibility/repeatability study. Subjects Twenty‐one healthy volunteers (35.6 ± 13.8 years). Field Strength/Sequence 3D T1‐weighted fast spoiled gradient recalled echo (FSPGR) sequence was performed once, and 3D‐QALAS sequence was performed twice with a 3T scanner. Assessment FreeSurfer and FIRST were used to measure cortical thickness and volume of subcortical structures, respectively. Agreement with FSPGR and scan–rescan repeatability were evaluated for 3D‐QALAS. Statistical Tests Percent relative difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess reproducibility and scan–rescan repeatability of the 3D‐QALAS sequence‐derived measurements. Results Percent relative difference compared with FSPGR in cortical thickness of the whole cortex was 3.1%, and 89% of the regional areas showed less than 10% relative difference in cortical thickness. The mean ICC across all regions was 0.65, and 74% of the structures showed substantial to almost perfect agreement. For volumes of subcortical structures, the median percent relative differences were lower than 10% across all subcortical structures, except for the accumbens area, and all structures showed ICCs of substantial to almost perfect agreement. For the scan–rescan test, percent relative difference in cortical thickness of the whole cortex was 2.3%, and 97% of the regional areas showed less than 10% relative difference in cortical thickness. The mean ICC across all regions was 0.73, and 80% showed substantial to almost perfect agreement. For volumes of subcortical structures, relative differences were less than 10% across all subcortical structures except for the accumbens area, and all structures showed ICCs of substantial to almost perfect agreement. Data Conclusion 3D‐QALAS could be reliably used for measuring cortical thickness and subcortical volumes in most brain regions. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1834–1842.