The velocity storage time constant: Balancing between accuracy and precision

The velocity storage mechanism is often described in terms of the exponential decay in eye velocity in an upright subject who experiences a constant velocity yaw rotation after a rapid acceleration. The velocity storage time constant for this decay is roughly 6-30s, which means that for low-frequenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in brain research Vol. 248; pp. 269 - 276
Main Author Karmali, Faisal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands 2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1875-7855
0079-6123
1875-7855
DOI10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.038

Cover

More Information
Summary:The velocity storage mechanism is often described in terms of the exponential decay in eye velocity in an upright subject who experiences a constant velocity yaw rotation after a rapid acceleration. The velocity storage time constant for this decay is roughly 6-30s, which means that for low-frequency head rotations, eye velocity and perceptions have large errors compared to actual motion. One may wonder if there would be benefits to having a longer time constant, which would improve accuracy. In this paper, simulations are used to highlight that improved accuracy may come at the cost of increased noise-i.e., reduced precision. Specifically, since the velocity storage mechanism extends the 5.7s time constant of the semicircular canal, it must be performing an integration process over a certain frequency range. In fact, all mathematical models of velocity storage include an integration. This integration would also integrate neural noise. Thus, increasing the velocity storage time constant would lead to integration over a wider range of frequencies, resulting in more noise in the brain's estimate of motion. Simulation results show this accuracy-precision tradeoff. Recent evidence is also reviewed supporting the hypothesis that the brain optimizes the velocity storage time constant to resolve this accuracy-precision tradeoff during aging and with variations in stimulus amplitude.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1875-7855
0079-6123
1875-7855
DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.038