FPRandom: Randomizing Core Browser Objects to Break Advanced Device Fingerprinting Techniques

The rich programming interfaces (APIs) provided by web browsers can be diverted to collect a browser fingerprint. A small number of queries on these interfaces are sufficient to build a fingerprint that is statistically unique and very stable over time. Consequently, the fingerprint can be used to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEngineering Secure Software and Systems Vol. 10379; pp. 97 - 114
Main Authors Laperdrix, Pierre, Baudry, Benoit, Mishra, Vikas
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3319621041
9783319621043
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-62105-0_7

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The rich programming interfaces (APIs) provided by web browsers can be diverted to collect a browser fingerprint. A small number of queries on these interfaces are sufficient to build a fingerprint that is statistically unique and very stable over time. Consequently, the fingerprint can be used to track users. Our work aims at mitigating the risk of browser fingerprinting for users privacy by ‘breaking’ the stability of a fingerprint over time. We add randomness in the computation of selected browser functions, in order to have them deliver slightly different answers for each browsing session. Randomization is possible thanks to the following properties of browsers implementations: (i) some functions have a nondeterministic specification, but a deterministic implementation; (ii) multimedia functions can be slightly altered without deteriorating user’s perception. We present FPRandom, a modified version of Firefox that adds randomness to mitigate the most recent fingerprinting algorithms, namely canvas fingerprinting, AudioContext fingerprinting and the unmasking of browsers through the order of JavaScript properties. We evaluate the effectiveness of FPRandom by testing it against known fingerprinting tests. We also conduct a user study and evaluate the performance overhead of randomization to determine the impact on the user experience.
Bibliography:The stamp on the top of this paper refers to an approval process conducted by the ESSoS artifact evaluation committee chaired by Karim Ali and Omer Tripp.
ISBN:3319621041
9783319621043
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-62105-0_7